diff options
author | Paul Duncan <pabs@pablotron.org> | 2021-10-14 12:47:50 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul Duncan <pabs@pablotron.org> | 2021-10-14 12:47:50 -0400 |
commit | 4b6c0e31385f5f27a151088c0a2b614495c4e589 (patch) | |
tree | 12243cdcd00704bc1a9d94ac9cc128459417370c /content/posts/2003-12-21-stupid-spammers.html | |
download | pablotron.org-4b6c0e31385f5f27a151088c0a2b614495c4e589.tar.bz2 pablotron.org-4b6c0e31385f5f27a151088c0a2b614495c4e589.zip |
initial commit, including theme
Diffstat (limited to 'content/posts/2003-12-21-stupid-spammers.html')
-rw-r--r-- | content/posts/2003-12-21-stupid-spammers.html | 53 |
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/posts/2003-12-21-stupid-spammers.html b/content/posts/2003-12-21-stupid-spammers.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..999eade --- /dev/null +++ b/content/posts/2003-12-21-stupid-spammers.html @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +--- +date: "2003-12-21T16:31:19Z" +title: Stupid Spammers +--- + +<p> +While <a href='http://www.unitedcolo.com/'>United Colo's</a> liberal <a +href='http://www.unitedcolo.com/service.htm'>acceptable use policy</a> +means we won't get booted for using naughty language, it means we also +run the risk of getting penalized by the <a +href='http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL10326'>behavior of +other machines on our subnet</a>. On the other hand, it looks like spam +<em>might</em> be prohibited. At the very least, it's certainly +discouraged. Here's the relevant portions of their <a +href='http://www.unitedcolo.com/service.htm'>acceptable use policy</a>: +</p> + +<blockquote cite='http://www.unitedcolo.com/service.htm'> +<p> +(v) Utilize the Services to (A) forge the signature or other identifying +mark or code of any other person, (B) impersonate or assume the identity +or any other person, or (C) engage in any other activity (including +"spoofing") to attempt to deceive or mislead other persons regarding the +true identity of the User (excluding the use of anonymous remailer or +Internet nicknames). +</p> + +<p> +... +</p> + +<p> +(viii) Utilize the Services to distribute, advertise or promote software +or services that have the primary purpose of encouraging or facilitating +unsolicited commercial e-mail or spam. +</p> + +<p> +(ix) Utilize the Services to solicit or collect, or distribute, +advertise or promote, e-mail address lists for the purpose of +encouraging or facilitating unsolicited commercial e-mail or spam. +</p> +</blockquote> + +<p> +So, they don't explicitly prohibit mass-mailing, but they do prohibit +spoofing, services and software that encourage spam, and using their +servers to distribute addresses for spamming. Whether or not that's +good enough to reduce the <a +href='http://www.spamhaus.org/'>Spamhaus</a> ban from a <code>/24</code> +to a <code>/32</code> remains to be seen. +</p> + |